The Championship table as of the latest matchday played: points, matches, wins, draws, losses and goals for and against, team by team.
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF:GA | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Swansea City | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 16:7 | 23 |
| 2 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 20:14 | 21 | |
| 3 | West Ham United | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 29:12 | 19 |
| 4 | Birmingham City | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 17:11 | 17 |
| 5 | Queens Park Rangers | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 15:9 | 17 |
| 6 | West Bromwich Albion | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 12:10 | 17 |
| 7 | Southampton | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 21:10 | 16 |
| 8 | Stoke City | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 17:16 | 16 |
| 9 | Blackburn Rovers | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15:13 | 15 |
| 10 | Wolverhampton Wanderers | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 16:14 | 14 |
| 11 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16:16 | 14 | |
| 12 | Bristol City | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 12:14 | 14 |
| 13 | Charlton Athletic | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 10:13 | 14 |
| 14 | Bolton Wanderers | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 15:18 | 13 |
| 15 | Sheffield United | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 14:14 | 12 |
| 16 | Portsmouth | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 12:13 | 11 |
| 17 | Wrexham | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 11:15 | 11 |
| 18 | Lincoln City | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 7:17 | 11 |
| 19 | Cardiff City | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 16:15 | 10 |
| 20 | Norwich City | 10 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 17:20 | 9 |
| 21 | Burnley | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 15:19 | 8 |
| 22 | Watford | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8:19 | 8 |
| 23 | Derby County | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9:19 | 6 |
| 24 | Preston North End | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8:20 | 4 |
Source: ESPN. Read on 16 October at 09:51.
Magazine pieces that explain the numbers on this page.
The same operator holds back 5.70% in the Premier League, 10.59% in Ligue 1 and 9.88% across its whole listing. The league you pick matters more than the bookmaker you pick.
It wins on 0, 1 or 2 total goals, and it came in on 49.1% of the 254,498 matches in our archive. How often that happens league by league — and why a thirty-year average is the wrong number to look at.
Three matches in seven days should change everything. We looked for the effect in the archive three ways: the first finds nothing, the second finds the opposite, the third explains why.